Foundations of mathematics
In
The Continuum Weyl developed the logic of
predicative analysis using the lower levels of
Bertrand Russell's ramified theory of types. He was able to develop most of classical calculus, while using neither the
axiom of choice nor
proof by contradiction, and avoiding
George Cantor's infinite sets. Weyl appealed in this period to the radical constructivism of the German romantic, subjective idealist
Fichte.
Shortly after publishing
The Continuum Weyl briefly shifted his position wholly to the
intuitionism of Brouwer. In
The Continuum, the constructible points exist as discrete entities. Weyl wanted a
continuum that was not an aggregate of points. He wrote a controversial article proclaiming that, for himself and L. E. J. Brouwer, "We are the revolution." This article was far more influential in propagating intuitionistic views than the original works of Brouwer himself.
George Pólya and Weyl, during a mathematicians' gathering in Zürich (February 9, 1918), made a
bet concerning the future direction of mathematics. Weyl predicted that in the subsequent 20 years, mathematicians would come to realize the total vagueness of notions such as
real numbers, sets, and
countability, and moreover, that asking about the
truth or falsity of the
least upper bound property of the real numbers was as meaningful as asking about truth of the basic assertions of
Georg Hegel on the philosophy of nature.
However, within a few years Weyl decided that Brouwer's intuitionism did put too great restrictions on mathematics, as critics had always said. The "Crisis" article had disturbed Weyl's
formalist teacher Hilbert, but later in the 1920s Weyl partially reconciled his position with that of Hilbert.
After about 1928 Weyl had apparently decided that mathematical intuitionism was not compatible with his enthusiasm for the
phenomenological philosophy of
Husserl, as he had apparently earlier thought. In the last decades of his life Weyl emphasized mathematics as "symbolic construction" and moved to a position closer not only to Hilbert but to that of
Ernst Cassirer. Weyl however rarely refers to Cassirer, and wrote only brief articles and passages articulating this position.