By Mussorgsky
From a letter to
Vladimir Stasov
<blockquote style="font-size: 90%">
"Life, wherever it reveals itself; truth, no matter how bitter; bold, sincere speech with people–these are my leaven, these are what I want, this is where I am afraid of missing the mark."
</blockquote>
From an autobiographical sketch:
<blockquote style="font-size: 90%">
"Art is a means of communicating with people, and not an aim in itself. This guiding principle has defined the whole of his [i.e., my] creative activity. Proceeding from the conviction that human speech is strictly controlled by musical laws (
Virchow,
Gervinus), he considers the function of art to be the reproduction in musical sounds not merely of feelings, but first and foremost of human speech."
</blockquote>
About Mussorgsky
An early (1863) opinion by Stasov, later Mussorgsky's staunchest supporter, in a letter to Balakirev:
<blockquote style="font-size: 90%">
"I have no use whatever for Mussorgsky. All in him is flabby and dull. He is, I think, a perfect idiot. Were he left to his own devices and no longer under your strict supervision, he would soon run to seed as all the others have done. There is nothing in him."
</blockquote>
Balakirev's reply to the above assessment:
<blockquote style="font-size: 90%">
"Yes, Mussorgsky is little short of an idiot."
</blockquote>
Nikolai Rimsky-Korsakov, on Mussorgsky's manuscripts:
<blockquote style="font-size: 90%">
"They were very defective, teeming with clumsy, disconnected harmonies, shocking part-writing, amazingly illogical modulations or intolerably long stretches without ever a modulation, and bad scoring. ...what is needed is an edition for practical and artistic purposes, suitable for performances and for those who wish to admire Mussorgsky's genius, not to study his idiosyncrasies and sins against art."
</blockquote>
Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky, in a letter to his patroness,
Nadezhda von Meck:
<blockquote style="font-size: 90%">
"Mussorgsky you very rightly call a hopeless case. In talent he is perhaps superior to all the [other members of The Five], but his nature is narrow-minded, devoid of any urge towards self-perfection, blindly believing in the ridiculous theories of his circle and in his own genius. In addition, he has a certain base side to his nature which likes coarseness, uncouthness, roughness.... He flaunts ... his illiteracy, takes pride in his ignorance, mucks along anyhow, blindly believing in the infallibility of his genius. Yet he has flashes of talent which are, moreover, not devoid of originality.
</blockquote>
Anatoly Lyadov:
<blockquote style="font-size: 90%">
"It is easy enough to correct Mussorgsky's irregularities. The only trouble is that when this is done, the character and originality of the music are done away with, and the composer's individuality vanishes."
</blockquote>
Edward Dannreuther, in an early (1905) edition of
The Oxford History of Music:
<blockquote style="font-size: 90%">
"Mussorgsky, in his vocal efforts, appears willfully eccentric. His style impresses the Western ear as barbarously ugly."
</blockquote>
Gerald Abraham, musicologist, an authority on Mussorgsky:
<blockquote style="font-size: 90%">
"As a musical translator of words and all that can be expressed in words, of psychological states, and even physical movement, he is unsurpassed; as an absolute musician he was hopelessly limited, with remarkably little ability to construct pure music or even a purely musical texture."
</blockquote>