As
Secretary of State in the Bush administration, Powell was perceived as moderate. Powell's great asset was his tremendous popularity among the American people. Over the course of his tenure he travelled less than any other U.S. Secretary of State in 30 years.
On
September 11,
2001, Powell was in
Lima,
Peru, meeting with President
Alejandro Toledo and US Ambassador to Peru John Hamilton, and attending the special session of the
OAS General Assembly that subsequently adopted the
Inter-American Democratic Charter.
After
September 11, Powell's job became of critical importance in managing America's relationships with foreign countries in order to secure a stable coalition in the
War on Terrorism.
In April 2002, he visited the site of the alleged
Jenin Massacre in the
West Bank and later said while testifying to Congress, "I've seen no evidence that would suggest a massacre took place." Details of the events were unclear at the time,
Shimon Peres was quoted by
Ha'aretz speaking of a
massacre and IDF estimates of the dead were in the 100s. Later investigations by human rights organizations and the United Nations placed the number of deaths amongst Palestinians between 52 and 500.
Powell came under fire for his role in
building the case for the
2003 Invasion of Iraq. In a press statement on
February 24,
2001 he had said that sanctions against Iraq had prevented the development of any weapons of mass destruction by
Saddam Hussein. As was the case in the days leading up to the Persian Gulf War, Powell was initially opposed to a forcible overthrow of Hussein, preferring to continue a policy of containment. However, Powell eventually agreed to go along with the Bush administration's determination to remove Hussein. He had often clashed with others in the administration, who were reportedly planning an Iraq invasion even before the September 11 attacks—an insight supported by testimony by former terrorism czar
Richard Clarke in front of the
9/11 Commission. The main concession Powell wanted before he would offer his full support for the Iraq War was the involvement of the international community in the invasion, as opposed to the unilateral approach some of the hawks were advocating. He was also successful in persuading Bush to take the case of Iraq to the United Nations, and in moderating other initiatives. Powell was placed at the forefront of this diplomatic campaign.
Powell's chief role was to
garner international support for a multi-national
coalition to mount the invasion. To this end, Powell addressed a plenary session of the
United Nations Security Council on
February 5,
2003 to argue in favor of military action. Citing "numerous" anonymous Iraqi defectors, Powell asserted that "there can be no doubt that Saddam Hussein has biological weapons and the capability to rapidly produce more, many more."
Powell also stated that there was "no doubt in my mind" that Saddam was working to obtain key components to produce nuclear weapons.
Most observers praised Powell's oratorical skills. However, Britain's Channel 4 News reported soon afterwards that a
UK intelligence dossier that Powell had referred to as a "fine paper" during his presentation had been based on old material and plagiarized an essay by an
American graduate student.
http://www.truthout.org/docs_02/020803A.htmhttp://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/02/07/sprj.irq.uk.dossier/index.html
A 2004 report by the
Iraq Survey Group concluded that the evidence that Powell offered to support the allegation that the Iraqi government possessed
weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) was inaccurate.
A Senate report on intelligence failures would later detail the intense debate that went on behind the scenes on what to include in Powell's speech. State Department analysts had found dozens of factual problems in drafts of the speech. Some of the claims were taken out, but others were left in, such as claims based on the
yellowcake forgery. The administration is currently under fire for having acted on faulty intelligence. Reports have indicated that Powell himself was skeptical of the evidence presented to him. Powell later recounted how Vice President Cheney had joked with him before he gave the speech, telling him, "You've got high poll ratings; you can afford to lose a few points." Larry Wilkerson later characterized Cheney's view of Powell's mission as to "go up there and sell it, and we'll have moved forward a peg or two. Fall on your damn sword and kill yourself, and I'll be happy, too."
In September 2005, Powell was asked about the speech during an interview with
Barbara Walters and responded that it was a "blot" on his record. He went on to say, "It will always be a part of my record. It was painful. It's painful now."
Mr. Powell's longtime
aide-de-camp Colonel
Lawrence B. Wilkerson said that he participated in a
hoax on the American people in preparing Mr. Powell's erroneous testimony before the United Nations Security Council.
Because Powell is seen as more moderate than most figures in the administration, he has been spared many of the attacks that have been leveled at more controversial advocates of the invasion, such as
Donald Rumsfeld and
Paul Wolfowitz. At times, infighting between the Powell-led State Department, the Rumsfeld-led Defense Department, and Vice President
Dick Cheney's office had the effect of paralyzing the administration on crucial issues, such as what actions to take regarding Iran and North Korea.
After Saddam Hussein had been deposed, Powell's new role was to once again establish a working international coalition, this time to assist in the rebuilding of post-war Iraq. On
September 13,
2004, Powell testified before the Senate Governmental Affairs Committee, acknowledging that the sources who provided much of the information in his February 2003 UN presentation were "wrong" and that it was "unlikely" that any stockpiles of WMDs would be found. Claiming that he was unaware that some intelligence officials questioned the information prior to his presentation, Powell pushed for reform in the intelligence community, including the creation of a national intelligence director who would assure that "what one person knew, everyone else knew".
Colin Powell announced his resignation as Secretary of State on Monday,
November 15,
2004. According to the
Washington Post, he had been asked to resign by the president's chief of staff,
Andrew Card. Powell announced that he would stay on until the end of Bush's first term or until his replacement's confirmation by Congress. The following day, George W. Bush nominated National Security Advisor
Condoleezza Rice, as Powell's successor. News of Powell's leaving the Administration spurred mixed reactions from politicians around the world—some upset at the loss of a statesman seen as a moderating factor within the Bush administration, but others hoping for Powell's successor to wield more influence within the cabinet, and thus be a more credible negotiator.
In mid-November, Colin Powell stated that he had seen new evidence suggesting that
Iran was adapting missiles for a nuclear delivery system. The accusation came at the same time as the settlement of an agreement between the
IAEA, the
European Union and
Iran.
On
December 31,
2004, Powell rang in the New Year by throwing the ball in
Times Square with New York City Mayor
Michael Bloomberg, ushering in the year 2005. He appeared on the networks that were broadcasting New Year's Eve specials and talked about this honor, as well as being a native of New York City.