Cheng Man-ch'ing's T'ai Chi Ch'uan
Cheng Man-ch'ing is best known in the West for his T'ai Chi Ch'uan. The following are some of the characteristics of his "Yang-style short form."
* It eliminates most of the repetitions of certain moves of the Yang long form.
* It takes around ten minutes to practice instead of the twenty to thirty minutes of the
Yang long form
* The hand and wrist are held open, yet relaxed, in what Cheng called the "Fair Lady's Hand" formation (as opposed to the straighter "Chinese tile" formation of the Yang style)
* The form postures are not as expansive as Yang Ch'eng-fu's form
* Cheng postures are performed in "middle frame" style, which changes the movement of the feet from the Yang version.
* Cheng's concept of "swing and return" in which the gathering
momentum from one movement powers the next (smoothly, with connection); moving from substantial to insubstantial (
yin to
yang) and back again - one metaphor is of a series of interlocking gears, whose tiniest movements cannot be initiated independently of one another. For one gear to move all must move.
These, and other important changes and natural developments, allowed Cheng to teach larger numbers of students in a shorter time. His shortened form became extremely popular in Taiwan and Malaysia, and he was among one of the earliest Chinese masters to teach T'ai Chi Ch'uan publicly in the United States. His students have continued to spread his work around the world.
It should be noted that Cheng rejected the appellation "Yang Style Short Form" to characterize his t'ai chi. When pressed on the issue, he called his form "Yang Tai Chi in 37 Postures." Even this may be misleading, however, since Cheng seems deliberately to have downplayed the length of his form. The postures in his form are counted differently from those in the Yang Cheng Fu form. In the older form each movement counts as a posture, whereas in the Cheng form postures are counted only the first time they are performed, and rarely or not at all when they are repeated. Moreover, certain postures which appear in the Cheng form, such as High Pat on Horse, are not counted at all. These differences in how the postures are counted have led some Cheng practitioners, such as
William C.C. Chen, to characterize their own forms as exceeding 70 "movements," and indeed, upon close comparison with the Yang Cheng Fu form, Cheng's postures, if counted the same way as Yang's are, would number over 70.
Cheng's changes to the Yang style form have never been officially recognised by the Yang family and (perhaps partly because of the continued popularity of Cheng's shortened form) his style is still a source of considerable controversy among some T'ai Chi Ch'uan practitioners. From Cheng's own point of view, the approval of his senior tai chi brother Chen Wei Ming was all the recognition he needed, since by that time Yang Cheng Fu was deceased, and all of the current generation of Yang Cheng Fu leaders were junior to him.
Moreover, such "controversy" should be understood in perspective. One-upmanship with regard to "original" vs. "watered down" teachings is ubiquitous in the Chinese martial arts world, and even the Yang Cheng Fu style and its leaders and adherents are not immune to this. For example, practitioners of the Guang Ping tai chi style, which traces its roots back to Yang Lu Chan through his second son, Ban Ho, claim that they, and not the Cheng Fu stylists, represent the true transmission of Yang tai chi.
Since this kind of tit-for-tat goes on interminably and settles nothing, many observers see a practitioner's performance in challenge matches as a more important criterion for judging mastery than the strict claims of lineage. In this regard, Cheng Man-Ching's credentials are stellar, and have been well docunmented by, among others, martial arts historian and author Robert W. Smith. During the course of Cheng's career, he stood against and defeated all manner of challengers, and because of this earned the respect of martial artists the world over.
Another controversy surrounding Cheng was (as with virtually all martial arts historically) who among his main students received what is often called the "true transmission" of the teachings, i.e., the (often secret, 'inner door') set of fundamental or "core" movement-principles, techniques and associated training practices which make up T'ai Chi. Cheng, however, dismissed such arguments, saying that anyone could acquire the "true flavor" of T'ai Chi by diligent practice according to the strict principles which are common (and essential) to all T'ai Chi styles. (A book by one of his New York pupils, Wolfe Lowenthal, was even called "There Are No Secrets.") In New York City, among Prof Cheng's senior students, Maggie Newman is still teaching.