When Garry Kasparov broke with
FIDE, the federation governing professional chess, to play the 1993 World Championship with
Nigel Short, he created a rift in the chess world. In response, FIDE sanctioned a match between
Anatoly Karpov and
Jan Timman for the FIDE World Championship, which Karpov won. Subsequently, the chess world has seen two "champions": the "classical" championship, claiming lineage dating back to
Steinitz; and the FIDE endorsed champion.
When Kramnik defeated Kasparov and inherited the classical championship, he also inherited its surrounding controversy.
At the next FIDE world championship (
FIDE World Chess Championship 2005), Kramnik refused to participate, but indicated his willingness to play a match against the winner to unify the world championship. After the tournament, negotiations began for a reunification match between Kramnik and the new FIDE World Champion —
Veselin Topalov of
Bulgaria.
In April 2006, FIDE announced a reunification match between Kramnik and Topalov — the
FIDE World Chess Championship 2006. The match took place in
Elista, Kalmykia. After the first four games, Kramnik led 3-1 (out of a maximum of 12). After the fourth game, however, Topalov protested that Kramnik was using the toilet suspiciously frequently, implying that he was somehow receiving outside assistance whilst doing so. Topalov said that he would refuse to shake hands with Kramnik in the remaining games. The Appeals committee decided that the players' toilets be locked and that they be forced to use a shared toilet, accompanied by an assistant arbiter.
Kramnik refused to play the fifth game unless the original conditions agreed for the match were adhered to. As a result, the point was awarded to Topalov, reducing Kramnik's lead to 3-2. Kramnik stated that the appeals committee was biased and demanded that it be replaced. As a condition to continue the match, Kramnik insisted on playing the remaining games under the original conditions of the match
contract, which allows use of the bathroom at the players' discretion.
The controversy resulted in a heavy volume of correspondence to
Chessbase and other publications. The balance of views from fans was in support of Kramnik. Prominent figures in the chess world, such as John Nunn, Yasser Seirawan, and Bessel Kok also sided with Kramnik.
The Russian and Bulgarian Chess Federations supported their respective players. Kramnik's behavior during the match earned him widespread support in the chess community.
After twelve regular games the match was tied 6-6, although Kramnik continued to dispute the result of the unplayed fifth game until the end of the tournament. On
October 13, 2006, the result of the disputed fifth game became moot as Kramnik won the rapid tie-break by a score of 2.5-1.5.