On
August 11, 1902, President
Theodore Roosevelt named Holmes to the
United States Supreme Court on the recommendation of Senator
Henry Cabot Lodge (Roosevelt reportedly admired Holmes's "Soldier's Faith" speech as well). The Senate unanimously confirmed the appointment on December 4, and Holmes took his seat on the Court December 8, 1902. Holmes succeeded Justice Horace Gray, who had retired in July 1902 as a result of illness. According to some accounts, Holmes assured Roosevelt that he would vote to sustain the administration's position that not all the provisions of the
United States Constitution applied to possessions acquired from Spain, an important question on which the Court was then evenly divided. On the bench, Holmes did vote to support the administration's position in "The
Insular Cases." However, he later disappointed Roosevelt by dissenting in
The Northern Securities Case, a major
antitrust prosecution (
Text of the U.S. Supreme Court finding).
Holmes was known for his pithy, short, and frequently quoted opinions. In more than thirty years on the Supreme Court bench he considered the whole range of federal law, and is remembered for prescient opinions on topics as widely separated as copyright, the law of contempt, the anti-trust status of professional baseball, and the oath required for citizenship. Holmes, like most of his contemporaries, viewed the
Bill of Rights as codifying privileges obtained over the centuries in English and American law. Beginning with his first opinion for the Court, in
Otis v. Parker, Holmes declared that "
due process of law," the fundamental principle of fairness, protected people from unreasonable legislation, but was limited to only those fundamental principles enshrined in the common law and did not protect most economic interests. In a series of opinions during and after the First World War, he held that the freedom of expression guaranteed by federal and state constitutions simply declared a common-law privilege to do harm, except in cases where the expression, in the circumstances in which it was uttered, posed a "clear and present danger" of causing some harm that the legislature had properly forbidden. In
Schenck v. United States, Holmes announced this doctrine for a unanimous Court, famously declaring that the First Amendment would not protect a person "falsely shouting fire in a theatre and causing a panic."
The following year, in
Abrams v. United States, Holmes delivered a strongly worded dissent in which he criticized the majority's use of the clear and present danger test, arguing that protests by political dissidents posed no actual risk of interfering with war effort. In his dissent, he accused the Court of punishing the defendants for their opinions rather than their acts. Although Holmes evidently believed that he was adhering to his own precedent, many later commentators accused Holmes of inconsistency, even of seeking to curry favor with his young admirers. The Supreme Court departed from his views where the validity of a statute was in question, adopting the principle that a legislature could properly declare that some forms of speech posed a clear and present danger, regardless of the circumstances in which they were uttered.
Holmes was criticized during his lifetime and afterward for his philosophical views, which his opponents characterized as
moral relativism. Holmes's critics believe that he saw few restraints on the power of a governing class to enact its interests into law. They assert that his moral relativism influenced him not only to support a broad reading of the constitutional guarantee of "freedom of speech," but also led him to write an opinion for the Court upholding Virginia's compulsory sterilization law in
Buck v. Bell,
274 U.S. 200 (
1927), where he found no constitutional bar to state-ordered
compulsory sterilization of an institutionalized, allegedly "feeble-minded" woman with the words, "three generations of imbeciles is enough." While his opposition points to this case as an extreme example of his moral relativism, other legal observers argue that this was a consistent extension of his own version of strict
utilitarianism, which weighed the morality of policies according to their overall measurable consequences in society and not according to their own normative worth.
Holmes was admired by the Progressives of his day who concurred in his narrow reading of "due process." He regularly dissented when the Court invoked due process to strike down economic legislation, most famously in the 1905 case of
Lochner v. New York. Holmes's dissent in that case, in which he wrote that "a Constitution is not intended to embody a particular economic theory," is one of the most-quoted in Supreme Court history. However, Holmes wrote the opinion of the Court in the
Pennsylvania Coal v. Mahon case which inaugurated regulatory takings jurisprudence in holding a Pennsylvania regulatory statute constituted a taking of private property. His dissenting opinions on behalf of freedom of expression were celebrated by opponents of the Red Scare and prosecutions of political dissidents that began during World War I. Holmes's personal views on economics were influenced by
Malthusian theories that emphasized struggle for a fixed amount of resources, however, he did not share the young Progressive's ameliorist views.
Holmes served until
January 12, 1932, when his brethren on the court, citing his advanced age (Holmes was, at 90, the oldest serving justice in the Court's history), suggested that he step down. He died of
pneumonia in
Washington, D.C. in 1935, two days short of his 94th birthday, leaving his residuary estate to the United States government (he had earlier said that "
taxes are the price we pay for
civilization"). He was buried in
Arlington National Cemetery, and is commonly recognized as one of the greatest justices of the U.S. Supreme Court.
Holmes's papers, donated to Harvard Law School, were kept closed for many years after his death, a circumstance that gave rise to numerous speculative and fictionalized accounts of his life. Catherine Drinker Bowen's fictionalized biography "Yankee from Olympus" was a long-time bestseller, and the 1951
Hollywood motion picture The Magnificent Yankee was based on a highly fictionalized
play about Holmes's life. Since the opening of the extensive Holmes papers in the 1980s, however, there has been a series of more accurate biographies and scholarly monographs.