William Cobbett arrived back in England soon after the
Peterloo Massacre. Cobbett joined with other Radicals in his attacks on the government and three times during the next couple of years was charged with libel.
In 1820 he stood for Parliament in
Coventry but finished bottom of the poll.
*
Cobbett was not content to let the stories come to him, he went out like a good reporter and dug them up, especially the story that he returned to time and time again in the course of his writings: the plight of the rural Englishman. He began riding around the country on horseback making observations of what was happening in the towns and villages. Rural Rides, a work which Cobbett is best known for today, first appeared in serial form in the Political Register running from 1822 to 1826; it was published in book form in 1830
** extract taken from the Biography
In 1829, he published
Advice to Young Men in which he heavily criticised the
Principle of Population published by the Reverend
Thomas Robert Malthus.
Cobbett continued to publish controversial material in the
Political Register and in July,
1831, was charged with seditious libel after writing a pamphlet entitled
Rural War in support of the
Captain Swing Riots, which applauded those who were smashing farm machinery and burning haystacks. Cobbett conducted his own defence and he was so successful that the jury failed to convict him.
Cobbett still had a strong desire to be elected to the House of Commons. He was defeated in
Preston in 1826 and
Manchester in 1832 but after the passing of the
1832 Reform Act Cobbett was able to win the parliamentary seat of
Oldham. In Parliament Cobbett concentrated his energies on attacking corruption in government and the
1834 Poor Law.
From 1831 until his death, he farmed at
Normandy, a village in
Surrey.
In his later life, however
Macaulay, a fellow MP, remarked that his faculties were impaired by age; indeed that his paranoia had developed to the point of insanity.
He was a gifted journalist, though later generations have taken offence at his some of his apparently
anti-Semitic and
racist views. He is considered to have started as an inherently conservative journalist and later became increasingly more radical and sympathetic to social ideals. He provides an alternative view of rural England in the age of an
Industrial Revolution with which he was not in sympathy.